99 million vaccinated, documented damage – it's high time for consequences

4551 peer-reviewed publications on potential side effects of the Covid vaccine, searchable, sortable, with source citations – that's the extent of the database maintained by the US organization React19 and its Australian partner Coverse. And no, this isn't all just the ramblings of desperate vaccine skeptics: a significant portion of these studies are sound, large-scale, and in some cases, have already been acknowledged by the authorities themselves.

Anyone claiming there's no evidence in the data simply hasn't looked at it. The largest vaccine safety study in history , a cohort of over 99 million vaccinated individuals published in the journal Vaccine, confirmed established safety signals in 2024 for myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines, as well as for Guillain-Barré syndrome and cerebral venous thrombosis following vector vaccines. This isn't a conspiracy theory; it's consensus epidemiology. Myocarditis is now listed in the package insert, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine was practically discontinued due to thrombosis, and AstraZeneca disappeared from the market. These findings are documented not despite, but because of, the official sources.

What is actually listed
Next to it is the Reanalysis of the registration studies of Pfizer and Moderna by Fraiman and colleagues, also in Vaccine, also not withdrawn: Approximately one additional serious side effect per 800 vaccinated people – an excess that exceeded the number of prevented Covid hospitalizations during the study period.

Discussed, challenged, but still unchallenged in print. Of course, a database of this size also contains weaknesses: an in-vitro observation of liver cells in a petri dish is not sufficient proof that the injection rewrites human DNA, however much this is claimed in some quarters. That is precisely the point of the analysis: to separate what is solid from what is overstretched. But someone has to do it.

The reckoning that doesn't want to be one
In Germany, an inquiry commission with the rather grand name "Review of the Corona Pandemic" has been meeting since September 2025. Fourteen members of parliament, fourteen experts, report due sometime in mid-2027 – conveniently late enough that half the responsible parties will have retired by then. The more rigorous parliamentary inquiry committee, which would have been allowed to scrutinize Mr. Spahn's mask procurement practices, was voted down. Contracts with a Swiss company worth hundreds of millions of euros are redacted, leaving the special investigator with nothing but black ink. "Review" here means: those responsible are staging their own exoneration and calling it transparency.

Swiss variant: Sitting it out
Here in Switzerland, things are handled more elegantly. When the scientific task force was disbanded in 2022, it explicitly recommended that the effectiveness of the measures be reviewed by independent bodies. The Council of States made the same demand. The Federal Council? It believes it has already addressed the issue sufficiently and, in the same breath, enshrined the certificate as a standard instrument in the revised Epidemics Act.

Even the NZZ – not a conspiracy theory publication – dryly observed that the will was lacking. At the same time, citizens are collecting signatures for an initiative to investigate the background of the pandemic, something a functioning democracy would have provided on its own. Anyone who takes the victims seriously ends up contacting the Post-Vaccine Syndrome Association and filing a complaint against Swissmedic , not an authority that feels responsible.

What really needs to be condemned
What is reprehensible after all this is not primarily the molecule itself, but the attitude. Anyone who is familiar with 99 million studies and official warnings and continues to mislead the public... safe and without side effects Anyone who sells out, lies deliberately. Anyone who threatens professional bans, declares critics to be dangerous, and dismisses victims as regrettable isolated cases, while the warning signs have long been in the professional journals, is acting in a contemptuous manner – this doesn't require proof of poisoning, the documented reality is sufficient.

It is high time this chapter was written not by the perpetrators, but by independent individuals with access to the files and without a felt-tip pen. It is high time that 4551 entries were no longer ridiculed as the hobby of hysterics, but finally officially sorted. It is high time that those who preached certainty where warning signs were already flashing, vacated their seats before they declare the next emergency. Because those who fail to address one pandemic are merely rehearsing the next – and then calling it "lessons for future pandemics"!