Windisch, October 27, 2025. Topic of the evening: "How does data analysis help public health?" Translation into reality: How does one defend one's own interpretive authority without anyone asking bothersome follow-up questions? Venue: University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland. Starring: ETH Professor Tanja Stadler, former head of the national COVID task force and high priestess of the "evidence-based" narrative. Directed by: Dr. Caspar Battegay, Head of Culture & Communication – and apparently also master of the microphones.
The drama unfolds quickly. During the Q&A session, Stefan Theiler, investigative journalist and long-time critic of the COVID-19 measures, speaks up. His sin: he doesn't ask how brilliant the models were, but rather where they might have been distorted, financially driven, and politically expedient. A sacrilege—and the liturgical correction follows immediately: microphone snatched, sound cut, debate stifled. An ETH professor (his name indistinct in the commotion) takes care of the rest: "This isn't a beer table!"—a wonderful phrase that perfectly captures the atmosphere of a beer table. Then: verbal barrage, physical jostling, and the discussion is cut short. Science, but please, without the scientific rigor.
Anyone who thinks this was just a slip-up underestimates the architecture. Our universities have erected an invisible railing: acceptable questions on the left, doubts to be rejected on the right. In theory, they thrive on falsification; in practice, on grant applications. Especially when the task force bigwigs of yesteryear are around – those circles who, with generous budgets, plotted the curves that then curated the lives of millions. And if anyone asks whether "uncertainty" might be used to consolidate power – see above: microphone out, next question.
Stadler gave a flawless presentation on the infallibility of data. Theiler, camera at the ready, ran towards the exit to protect his footage from eager hands. It's a familiar image from bygone days: those who speak the truth need not only a fast horse, but these days also camera insurance. On the side of the A video clip is now circulating about Freiheitstrycher. From minute nine onwards: You see what you're not supposed to see – the hand on the microphone, the raised voices, the hasty tidying up of the embarrassment.
Of course, one could say, "It was just about moderation!" Sure. And house searches are merely particularly ambitious apartment inspections. The point is simpler: when questions become dangerous, the question itself isn't the problem. It's the fragile self-image of a discipline that has been misused as a political oracle for years—and has grown accustomed to the pedestal. Those at the top don't like steps.
Windisch is therefore more than just a local scandal. It's a small, honest scene in a larger, dishonest drama: doubt is declared a disruption, dissent a disruption of operations. And the company? It then praises itself for its "culture of debate," just as one celebrates fire safety after locking all the fire extinguishers.
Switzerland, it is often said, is the home of debate. If that's true, then a microphone shouldn't be a scepter that bestows favor, but a tool that everyone is free to use – especially those who ask the wrong question at the right time. Until then, Windisch remains a cautionary tale: about data as dogma, moderation as a muzzle brake – and a public that should be asking itself why questions, of all things, are causing the most noise these days.

"Dravens Tales from the Crypt" has been enchanting for over 15 years with a tasteless mixture of humor, serious journalism - for current events and unbalanced reporting in the press politics - and zombies, garnished with lots of art, entertainment and punk rock. Draven has turned his hobby into a popular brand that cannot be classified.








