In the following 1977 interview with Dr. Robert O. Becker, broadcast on the program "60 Minutes," he explains his opposition to the U.S. Navy's "Seafarer" project (also known as Sanguine). The Navy's plan involved laying 3862 kilometers of antenna cable across an area of ​​10,372 square kilometers to provide submarines with extremely low frequency (ELF) signals. While the Navy asserted the project's "absolute safety," Dr. Becker warned that these weak electromagnetic fields could interfere with the body's natural electrical signals and potentially lead to serious health problems such as heart disease, stroke, and developmental disorders.

The science of combating electromagnetic fields

Dr. Becker highlighted a 1973 report that, according to him, the Navy attempted to cover up. This report documented clear effects on animals and humans, including stress and a significant increase in serum triglycerides. He argued that science was biased, as it only acknowledged damage from heat or electric shocks and ignored the subtle effects of low-dose radiation on biological systems. The video also shows that funding for research projects that demonstrated these adverse effects was suddenly cut off—a pattern that ultimately led to the closure of laboratories like Becker's.

1977 vs. Today
When Dr. Becker issued his warning in 1977, he was focusing on a huge marine antenna and high-voltage power lines. At that time, exposure to artificial electromagnetic fields was still distant and occurred only occasionally. Today, these fields are much closer and active around the clock. Most people now carry a transmitter in their pocket, sleep near a Wi-Fi router, and live near 5G and 6G cell towers, which are erected at regular intervals.

The safety regulations for this technology have not been updated since 1996. These outdated rules only protect against thermal damage, meaning they only consider whether the radiation is strong enough to heat the body. They ignore the biological damage identified by Dr. Becker, such as DNA stress, which occurs at significantly lower doses of radiation and without any heat generation. In 2021, a federal court even ruled that the FCC acted unlawfully by maintaining these 1996 rules, as the government ignored thousands of pages of research on how 5G and other wireless signals affect children and the environment.

There is a fundamental difference between natural and artificial radiation. Natural energy from the Earth is random and disordered. Artificial radiation from 5G and 6G, on the other hand, is "polarized," meaning it pulsates in a specific, predetermined pattern. This places a constant strain on our cells in a way that does not occur in nature. Although the industry claims that these 5G and 6G radiation levels are harmless, they are still based on a 1996 reference value that was never designed for today's world.

The science of combating electromagnetic fields
The science of combating electromagnetic fields

Sources
• 60 Minutes: Project Seafarer: Full transcript of the interview with Dr. Becker from 1977.
• Navy Report AD750271 (Archive): The official bibliography from 1972 with over 2300 biological effects.
• FCC safety limitsThe 1996 regulation that establishes today's standards.
• Court ruling from 2021The Federal Court's decision describes the limits set by the FCC as "arbitrary".
• Scientific Reports (2015): A peer-reviewed study on why polarized (artificial) electromagnetic fields are more bioactive.

Transparency note: Illustrations were created digitally and are for illustrative purposes only. This article has been editorially reviewed and approved.

Support Dravens Tales from the Crypt

Dravan flag NEW square 300 2"Dravens Tales from the Crypt" has been enchanting for over 15 years with a tasteless mixture of humor, serious journalism - for current events and unbalanced reporting in the press politics - and zombies, garnished with lots of art, entertainment and punk rock. Draven has turned his hobby into a popular brand that cannot be classified.

My blog was never designed to spread news, let alone get political, but with current affairs I just can't help but capture information here that is otherwise censored on all other channels. I am aware that the design page may not seem "serious" to many in this regard, but I will not change this to please the "mainstream". Anyone who is open to non-state-compliant information sees the content and not the packaging. I've tried enough to provide people with information over the last 2 years, but quickly noticed that it never matters how it's "packaged", but what the other person's attitude towards it is. I don't want to put honey on anyone's mouth to meet expectations in any way, so I'll keep this design because hopefully at some point I'll be able to stop making these political statements, because it's not my goal to go on like this forever ;) I leave it up to everyone how they deal with it. However, you are welcome to simply copy and distribute the content, my blog has always been under the WTFPL license.

It's hard for me to describe what I'm actually doing here, DravensTales has become a culture blog, music blog, shock blog, tech blog, horror blog, fun blog, a blog about found items on the internet, internet bizarre, trash blog, art blog, water heater, zeitgeist blog over the years , Scrap blog and grab bag blog called. Everything that is right ... - and yet not. The main focus of the blog is contemporary art, in the broadest sense of the word.

To ensure the continued operation of this site, you are welcome to make a donation via credit card, PayPal, Google Pay, Apple Pay, or direct debit/bank account . Many thanks to all readers and supporters of this blog!


We are being censored!

Our content is now being completely censored. The major search engines have been asked to remove our articles from their results. Stay connected with us via Telegram , donate to support our independence , or subscribe to our newsletter.

Newsletter

No thanks!