The WDR with research results from the Fraunhofer Institute enlightens the would-be climate protectors. The main focus here is on the route taken by the raw materials to the factory and completion through assembly. The energy requirement during assembly is negligible. Tesla itself says that up to 15 tons of CO2 are generated during production. Such scientific truths will certainly soon be banned under penalty. After all, it is a clear attack on the cognitive performance of our politicians (almost) in unison!
Now I hear self-proclaimed climate saviors say that “electricity from the socket” does not exist in this form, because during the day you can almost only charge with electricity from renewable sources, because wind and sun cover almost 100% during the day. It should be said that the “renewables” already have an extremely poor ecological balance in terms of production, transport, construction, operation and disposal. And who charges their e-car during the day? This is also the case with electric heat. Ultimately, it's little to no benefit. Sometimes even a disadvantage. Electricity is not climate-neutral and the generation of renewable electricity results in enormous environmental damage. Wind turbines extract energy from the wind. Air or ground heat pumps. solar of the sun. turbines to the water. Everything is possible to a certain extent, but the energy demand that we need cannot be met in this way.






"Dravens Tales from the Crypt" has been enchanting for over 15 years with a tasteless mixture of humor, serious journalism - for current events and unbalanced reporting in the press politics - and zombies, garnished with lots of art, entertainment and punk rock. Draven has turned his hobby into a popular brand that cannot be classified.







