Many people are fed up with the so-called "scientific facts"

Recently, an article entitled "Why lateral thinkers believe they were right" appeared in the press. (Of course, they weren't right, at least not based on the facts, which weren't even known at the time, but rather on a gut feeling. "Like a blind hen that occasionally finds a grain of corn.") Immunologist Dr. Kay Klapproth responded to this with a letter to the editor of the RNZ, which was not published. We would like to rectify that here:

Dear editors of the Rhein-Neckar-Zeitung,
thank you very much for your article in which you explain to us that critics of the Covid-19 "vaccinations" are like blind chickens who find a seed every now and then and therefore now have the wrong image of being right.
In her article it says: "This picture, to which the supporters are still referring, was not created on the basis of specialist knowledge and the examination of facts, according to Frühwirth. But purely from a gut feeling.”
I myself have been working as a biologist in immunological research for 20 years and during this time I have acquired a distinct and differentiated "gut feeling".
During this pandemic, my “gut feeling” told me that developing a vaccine based on a single viral protein, which was also recognized as toxic, would not be a good idea because, on the one hand, we are dealing with a rapid evolutionary evasion of viruses from the immune response and on the other hand, the special properties of the spike proteins could lead to incalculable side effects.
This "gut feeling" told me that if we inject a drug into the muscle, it won't stay there because the muscle is perfused and the lipid nanoparticles with the mRNA will travel to other regions of the body where they will stimulate the protein expression of the spike proteins, thereby dangerously affecting normal cell and immune system functions.
My "gut feeling" told me that the principle in medicine and immunology still applies today: a new vaccine requires comprehensive and sufficient pre-clinical and clinical tests that prove its effectiveness and safety. If you want to use a completely new method to "vaccinate" billions of people, you must not rely on the information provided by the manufacturers, but must ensure that particular warning voices are heard in order to avoid endangering the health of many people brings.
My "gut feeling" explained to me that, according to our scientific experience, the intramuscular administration of a novel "vaccine" based on nucleic acids will not create sufficient immunity at the interfaces of our body (mucous membranes) and it is therefore extremely unlikely that we will " Vaccination” can protect other people from infection. My gut thought that the political pressure on the “unvaccinated” and their social exclusion were therefore unjustified and should therefore be rejected.
My "gut feeling" has also always warned me that it would be too risky to treat young people and children who are practically not threatened by Covid-19 with "vaccines" whose side effects have not yet been sufficiently researched.
But the «real» scientists have explained to us what the facts are: no «vaccination» has ever been so well monitored, there are no «long-term effects», this «vaccination» protects oneself and others, children also have to be «vaccinated» to be protected and without "vaccination" there is no return to normal. People who have not subscribed to this view have been dismissed by you as lateral thinkers, corona deniers, swearers, conspiracy theorists and worse, whom it is best not to listen to at all.
I hope my children can study GOOD FEELING at the universities of the future, because many people have had enough of your so-called “scientific facts” by now.
With kind regards,
dr Kay Klapproth