Helmut Schmidt warned against the Greens

Small but fine compilation. If someone had told me in the 80s that in 2020 you had to listen to Radio Moscow to get a rough idea of ​​what was happening in the world and at home, I would have thought they were crazy...

Helmut Schmidt warned about the Greens - good little summary  :(
Helmut Schmidt warned about the Greens - good little summary :) :(

Strack-Zimmermann vs. Ravensburg

Grandma Courage gun lobbyist on fire! Brilliant audience, exactly what Strack-Rheinmetall deserves! But actually, they were way too kind and nice with all the insults from the subject... complains about insults on the Internet but insults people in the open who don't agree with them. Great grandma, you are a role model for all of us…..not!

Strack-Zimmermann vs. Ravensburg
Strack-Zimmermann vs. Ravensburg

Is the WHO pandemic treaty a diversionary tactic?

The World Health Organization's (WHO) infamous pandemic treaty could be a diversionary tactic, says James Roguski. In his Substacks Roguski warns that the world has less than two months to “crush the WHO,” a pun on the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “pandemic,” when we were told it was just It would take “two” weeks to flatten the curve.

WHO is rewriting the history of the pandemic

The problem with the pandemic treaty is the fact that it has been revised several times and many observers judge it on the basis of inaccurate and outdated information. This misinformation has become a red herring, which in logic theory means that it is used as a distraction to distract from the real discussion of what is actually going on.

The latest version of the WHO's proposed 2024 changes suggests that the current negotiations are not about the WHO attacking national sovereignty or anything more Mandates or bans imposed and that it's not really about the WHO doing anything. Roguski suggests that people read the latest documents to see if they really say what many people say. In short, he argues that the pandemic treaty is not a power grab by the WHO, as many people think.

“This agreement will be written by countries by countries and implemented by countries according to their own national laws,” Roguski writes, suggesting that individual nations, not the WHO, will be responsible for the entire tyranny. “The pandemic agreement will not give the WHO the power to dictate policy to any country. In fact, it says the exact opposite.” To support his argument, Roguski cites Article 24, paragraph 3 of the Pandemic Treaty negotiating text, which reads:

“Nothing in the WHO Pandemic Agreement shall be construed as granting the WHO Secretariat, including the WHO Director-General, any authority to direct, direct, modify or otherwise prescribe the domestic laws or policies of any Party or otherwise enforce requirements for the contracting parties to take certain measures, for example banning or admitting travelers, imposing vaccination requirements or therapeutic or diagnostic measures or implementing lockdowns.

If this is truly true, then health freedom fighters are focusing their efforts on the wrong targets. The real targets appear to be local tyrants, state government officials who plan to abuse their rights during the next fake “pandemic.” In Roguski's view, today's pandemic treaty is significantly different from the one proposed over a year ago. This seems intentional in that the earlier versions may have been a red herring to keep everyone from focusing their efforts on what matters most.

He encourages everyone who latest version of the pandemic agreement to get your own opinion. “What if… the proposed ‘pandemic agreement’ was NOT an attack on national sovereignty?” Roguski asks. “What if it is actually an expression of national sovereignty, but sovereignty is defined in the document in a way that means something different than you think?”

«What if... 'national sovereignty' and 'legally binding' international agreements don't work the way you imagine? ...What if... the WHO negotiations are NOT about your relationship with your doctor? What if your doctor is already a well-trained marketing representative for the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex?"

Take a look at that latest documents and let us know your opinion.

WHO is burning
(via Exposing The Darkness)

Blackrock – curse or blessing?

BlackRock & Co have a very negative image in the mainstream and alternative media alike - there are numerous myths and conspiracy theories surrounding it. Horst Luening In his latest video, he broke down exactly what BlackRock does and what makes them so successful and why they even have an extremely positive impact. The business model is simply explained: They enable private and institutional investors to invest broadly in the stock market - at very low costs. Previously, this business was in the hands of banks and funds that literally ripped off investors with horrendous fees and skimmed off most of the profits from the stock market themselves.

Due to the business model, they are of course invested in most public companies. However, they only hold the shares in trust for their customers. Investors are ultimately the owners of the shares and therefore also the companies. There is a lot of competition in this field and it is a very competitive field. If BlackRock did not act in the benefit of its customers, their assets would very quickly be withdrawn for management and transferred elsewhere.

Those who entrusted their assets to BlackRock were able to more than double their assets every 10 years. Whereas with a bank investment, the assets have shrunk nominally. Ultimately the rule applies: you can't not be invested. Unless you have no assets whatsoever (i.e. 0 euros in your checking account). As of today, 85% of Germans are not invested in the stock market. Most of them therefore make their assets available to their banks - from which only their banks benefit, while they themselves suffer losses due to inflation. Companies like BlackRock, on the other hand, enable their customers to achieve an annual return well above inflation and earn their money with a small annual fee of 0,2%.

Blackrock - curse or blessing?
Blackrock - curse or blessing?

SUCK! - The musical

Here's the first musical that I didn't turn off immediately. Schland – the musical – coming soon to her insolvent store. Get some rotten eggs and mushy tomatoes for the cast of what is probably the best AI musical ever on YouTube...

SUCK! - The musical
SUCK! - The musical

Karlchen lousy on the abraden!

That's why he legalized smoking weed, and the music like this: vaccination vaccination vaccination vaccination... :)

Karlchen lousy on the abraden!
Karlchen lousy on the abraden!

Weather Manipulation: Lecture by Dr. Philipp Zeller about geoengineering and HAARP

An overview of ongoing research by Philipp Zeller, Dr. Sc. Nat., Dipl. Physicist ETH. In his lecture he addresses the following questions:

Blessing or danger?
Why is the weather manipulated?
What methods are there?
How do I recognize the processes?
What is certain, what is speculation?
What can we do?

A lecture from April 2022 at ParaZug, Switzerland

Weather Manipulation - Lecture by Dr. Philipp Zeller about geoengineering and HAARP
Weather Manipulation - Lecture by Dr. Philipp Zeller about geoengineering and HAARP

Shrinkflation: This is how manufacturers hide more expensive prices

Some price increases are so subtle that consumers barely notice them. The magic word: shrinkflation. Specifically, this means less content for the same price! Diapers, drinks, cheese – examples abound. «Checkout» shows further methods of how brand manufacturers and major distributors covertly increase prices and make a killing in the process. Nowhere is there more lying and cheating than in the food industry and it has been for over 25 years (or always?), at least that's what I've been told for many years by people who work in this industry...

Shrinkflation: This is how manufacturers hide more expensive prices | 2024 | Cash register fall | SRF
Shrinkflation: This is how manufacturers hide more expensive prices | 2024 | Cash register fall | SRF

Separate or integrate the dark sides?

Light and shadow are somehow one - that's how a psychologist sees it and for those who don't understand it, he also explains why... by the way, Rüdiger Dahlke found this out almost 15 years ago in his book "The Shadow Principle" and before him CG Jung knew...

Light and shadow, but somehow one #giouncensored #germany #cancelculture
Light and shadow, but somehow one #giouncensored #germany #cancelculture

Nahum Goldmann: The plan to destroy Europe

In 1915, in the middle of the First World War, Nahum Goldmann, the later president of the World Zionist Congress, revealed with incredible candor a program for the destruction of Europe. It is a program of total destruction, the total dissolution of all traditions, customs, ties and barriers. The purpose: Complete anarchy and instability should arise everywhere in order to then be able to build a “new pyramidal, hierarchical system” (namely that of the Yahweh priesthood) unhindered. It says, among other things:

«The meaning and historical mission of our time can be summarized in one thing: its task is to reorganize civilized humanity, to replace the previously dominant social system with a new one... All reorganization and reorganization now consists of two things: in the destruction of the old order and the reconstruction of the new one. First of all, all boundaries, order barriers and labels of the previous system must be removed and all elements of the system that are to be reorganized must be separated out as such, equivalent to one another (ie “devaluation” through “equivalence”, RB). Only then can the second step, the reorganization of these elements, begin. So the first task of our time is destruction: all social stratifications and social formations that the old system created must be destroyed, individual people must be torn out of their traditional milieu; no tradition can be considered sacred anymore; age is considered only a sign of illness; The slogan is: what was has to go. The forces that carry out this negative task of our time are: in the economic-social sphere, capitalism, in the political-intellectual sphere, democracy. We (who??) all know how much they have already achieved; but we also know that their work is not yet fully finished. Capitalism is still fighting against the forms of the old, traditional economy, and democracy is still waging a hot battle against all the forces of reaction. The militaristic spirit will complete the work. His uniforming principle will completely carry out the negative task of the time: once all members of our cultural circle are uniformed as soldiers of our cultural system, this one task will be solved. But only then does the other, larger and more difficult task arise: the construction of the new order. The members, which have now been torn from their old roots and stratifications and lie around disorderly, anarchically, must be closed into new formations and categories...a new pyramidal, hierarchical system must be established.
(Nahum Goldmann: The spirit of militarism, Stuttgart/Berlin, Dt. Verlags-Anstalt, 1915, 5.378.)

Nahum Goldmann: The plan to destroy Europe

Preach water and drink wine

vaccinations for freedom, weapons for peace, censorship for democracy – the world is upside down. A great group with Joana Cotar, Michael Meyen, Kay Ray and Thomas Stimmel, that is a culture of conversation that you no longer find in the mainstream media. A pleasure every minute...

PREACHING WATER AND DRINKING WINE with Joana Cotar, Michael Meyen, Kay Ray and Thomas Stimmel
PREACHING WATER AND DRINKING WINE with Joana Cotar, Michael Meyen, Kay Ray and Thomas Stimmel

Khalil Gibran: The Prophet

The Prophet, Gibran's best-known work, was published in 1923 and has since sold millions of copies. The author worked on the book for 25 years. The book is still popular today and continues to be published in many languages. Based on his personal experiences, Gibran attempts to reconcile oriental melancholy and European world views with a timeless wisdom.

The 28 chapters deal with the timeless themes of love, friendship and marriage, death and freedom. The chapter about children is famous:

You can give them your love, but not your thoughts, because they have their own thoughts. You can house their bodies, but not their souls, for their souls reside in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams...

Khalil Gibran: The Prophet | AUDIOBOOK | AUDIOBOOK
Khalil Gibran: The Prophet | AUDIOBOOK | AUDIOBOOK

We are being censored!

Our content is now fully censored. The major search engines were asked to remove our articles from their results. Stay with us Telegram in touch or subscribe to our newsletter.


No thanks!